NOW READ OUR ARTICLES IN 40 DIFFERENT LANGUAGES.
HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PAY HERE

Vol. 14, No. 12 Week of March 22, 2009
Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry

Governor’s bill would unite 6 Alaska utilities

Click here to go to the full PDF version of this issue, with any maps, photos or other artwork that appears in some of the articles.

Proposal would have utilities buy wholesale power through state corporation; bill calls for plan to Legislature next January

Dan Joling

Associated Press Writer

The six utilities that serve most Alaskans would buy wholesale power through a new state corporation under a bill sent to the Legislature March 6 by Gov. Sarah Palin.

Palin announced a statewide energy plan in January and said a single entity is needed to plan, finance and build future power plants within Alaska’s Railbelt, named for areas touched by tracks of the Alaska Railroad and covering about 65 percent of the population, to take advantage of economies of scale.

The new entity would be called the Greater Railbelt Energy and Transmission Corp.

The six Railbelt utilities are small by Lower 48 standards and together generate a peak load of 875 megawatts, less than some single coal or nuclear plants elsewhere.

Nearly half the existing Railbelt generation capability is scheduled to be retired in 15 years and Cook Inlet natural gas, which has helped keep rates low, is expected to either run low or jump in price. That means substantial investment will be needed for new plants, but energy experts say single utilities do not have the resources to build large projects that could give consumers the best rates.

AEA recommended authority

The call for a centralized power authority follows the recommendation of an $800,000 state study overseen by the Alaska Energy Authority. The Railbelt Energy Grid Authority study, released in September, studied management options and concluded that whether new power is generated by natural gas, coal or a hydroelectric project, a united entity with streamlined management and combined assets could save rate-payers $40 million annually over management by the six utilities.

The six utilities affected are Golden Valley Electric Association in Fairbanks, Matanuska Electric Association, Chugach Electric Association, Anchorage Municipal Light & Power, the City of Seward and Homer Electric Association.

The utilities worked on the development of Palin’s proposal but support remains mixed.

Chugach Electric spokesman Phil Steyer said his cooperative supports the concept and the bill itself. Brian Newton, head of Golden Valley Electric Association, told the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner that he was disappointed that the bill carried more stick than carrot as incentive for utilities to join.

The utilities historically have enjoyed state grants to help pay for new power plants or interties but state officials have said that support is less likely in the future unless the utilities work together.

Power at cost

Palin’s bill would set up the corporation to operate on a nonprofit basis. Its stated purpose would be to provide adequate and reliable wholesale power to the utilities at the lowest cost, procure a fuel supply and ensure adequate transmission.

The corporation’s board would be made up of two representatives from each utility and one member appointed by the governor.

The bill calls for the corporation to adopt a plan for selecting new generation and transmission projects.

It also calls for the corporation, with the Alaska Energy Authority, to develop a transition and finance plan before Jan. 19 — no small task given that the utilities operate under a variety of state and federal rules, depending on their makeup. They all have long-term obligations for purchasing fuel and paying off debt.

Palin’s energy adviser, Joe Balash, said the plan envisions the corporation acquiring the power plants of the utilities unless they’re near the end of their useful lives or covenants on debts would make them more expensive to acquire than what they’re worth. In any case, he said, power they generate would be sold to the new corporation to be dispatched most economically as part of an overall portfolio.

Utilities would have until July 2010 to decide whether to be part of the corporation or continue to operate independently.



Print this story | Email it to an associate.





Copyright 2003 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistrubuted.

Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469
[email protected] --- https://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

This story has 807 words, takes 2 min. to speedread and it is 1982 pixels high.