HOME PAGE SUBSCRIPTIONS, Print Editions, Newsletter PRODUCTS READ THE PETROLEUM NEWS ARCHIVE! ADVERTISING INFORMATION EVENTS PETROLEUM NEWS BAKKEN MINING NEWS

Providing coverage of Alaska and northern Canada's oil and gas industry
April 2013

Vol. 18, No. 15 Week of April 14, 2013

Open Arctic Ocean opens new dangers

Alaska Coast Guard commander comments on relative risks of shipping and oil exploration in Arctic waters

Alan Bailey

Petroleum News

As the climate warms and the Arctic sea ice cover shrinks, especially in the summer and fall, new economic opportunities are arising in Arctic waters. Russia is opening up a sea route around its northern coast and through the Bering Strait; tourist cruise ships have started appearing in previously inaccessible northern locations; and the oil industry is looking to the Arctic seas as a new frontier for building their oil and gas inventories.

The 2012 open water season saw Shell starting work on the first oil exploration wells seen in Alaska’s Arctic outer continental shelf in a couple decades.

But new activity brings new risks. On March 27, during a field hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Oceans, Atmosphere, Fisheries and Coast Guard, Rear Adm. Thomas Ostebo, commander of the U.S. Coast Guard 17th District spoke to Sen. Mark Begich about some of the risks that the Coast Guard sees in the changing Arctic offshore scene.

The Coast Guard is currently investigating the Dec. 31 grounding in the Gulf of Alaska of the Kulluk, Shell’s Arctic floating drilling platform — people have been citing the Kulluk grounding as illustrating the dangers of operating in Alaska seas.

And, while the possibility of an oil spill from an offshore well is an obvious cause for concern, risks associated with Arctic shipping off the Alaska coastline are creating some headaches for the Coast Guard.

Increased traffic

Ostebo said that, while any possibility of pollution of the ocean is of concern to the Coast Guard, he sees the steadily increasing volume of vessel traffic through the Bering Strait as bringing a particularly high risk of a marine accident in the Arctic. Of the almost 500 vessels that passed through the strait in 2012, only 22 vessels were part of Shell’s Arctic drilling program, he said. And, whereas the Coast Guard has pretty good oversight of vessels transiting between U.S. ports, the agency has little information about foreign flagged vessels travelling, say, from the north coast of Russia to Singapore or China.

“The highest probability of an incident is clearly the increased maritime traffic across the water,” Ostebo said, commenting that on the same day that the Kulluk ran aground the Coast Guard was involved in 15 other search and rescue cases around Alaska. Vessel accidents, including groundings, collisions, fires and people overboard, are quite common and there is an incident currently in progress involving the grounding on Kodiak Island of the Pacific Producer, a fish processing vessel.

When working with Shell in 2012, the Coast Guard had inspected all of the company’s vessels, knew where the vessels were located and had people on board, Ostebo said.

“We were all over them,” he said.

But a liquid condensate vessel perhaps coming from northern Russia through the Bering Strait, unannounced, with an unknown crew and millions of gallons of product on board, would present an entirely different situation.

“Those things can seriously bother me,” Ostebo said. “I don’t know what route they’re taking and they show up on our screen randomly.”

International initiatives

The Coast Guard is engaged with international partners on an evaluation of vessel traffic management and ship routing measures for the Bering Strait, Ostebo said.

Ostebo also said that the Coast Guard is actively working with the Arctic Council, the United Nations International Maritime Organization and other groups to develop new safety standards for Arctic shipping and to develop international instruments for Arctic marine oil pollution preparedness and response.

“Last month we hosted representatives from Russia — their state maritime pollution control, salvage and rescue administration — to sign an expanded memorandum of understanding and joint contingency plan to foster cooperation between our two nations in the event of an oil spill in the region,” Ostebo said. The Coast Guard is also conducting joint contingency response exercises with Canada, he said.

The Coast Guard is also involved in an initiative in the International Maritime Organization to develop a Polar code, an international agreement over issues such as ship designs for safe operation in Arctic waters.

Annual operations

Meantime, in Arctic Alaska, the Coast Guard has set up temporary operating locations in Prudhoe Bay, Barrow, Kotzebue and Nome each summer since 2008, and has deployed cutters, boats, helicopters, communications equipment and safety teams to the region, Ostebo said. The agency has worked with the oil industry on pollution prevention, preparedness and response, he said.

“Those engaged in industrial activities in the Arctic must also plan and prepare for emergency response in the face of the harsh environment; long transient distances for air and surface assets; and limited response resources,” Ostebo said.

During the 2012 open water season, in addition to deploying assets in connection with Shell’s drilling activities, the Coast Guard tested its own oil skimming and recovery systems in Alaska waters, he said.

The Coast Guard also participates in the interagency working group that President Obama established for the coordination of energy development permitting in Alaska.

Future activity

With Shell having deferred its Arctic drilling plans for 2013, Ostebo anticipates an opportunity to focus on issues relating to the Bering Strait in the coming summer. However, the Coast Guard will deploy to the Arctic as usual this year and will continue a successful outreach program with Alaska Natives — the Coast Guard is working hard to protect the way of life of the indigenous people of the north, Ostebo said.

The open water season of 2014 could prove very busy, especially if Shell and ConocoPhillips move ahead with their planned drilling in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. Ostebo also said that he anticipates a significant amount of marine activity in 2014, triggered by developments at the Point Thomson field, with perhaps 30 to 40 barges being lightered from offshore. The Coast Guard will be “all over” that activity because of the potential for an accident, Ostebo said.

Sequestration, the cuts in the federal government budget, is a concern for the Coast Guard and the agency is in the process of assessing the impact of this on its operations.

“We have a reduction in our flight hours and our offshore maritime activity is being reduced because of that,” Ostebo said.





Coast Guard icebreaker returns to service

According to an April 8 press release from Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, and Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., the U.S. Coast Guard ice breaker Polar Star is now ready for operational deployment following a major refit. The aging icebreaker had been out of action, in a “caretaker” status, since 2006.

With the Polar Star out of commission, the only working U.S. icebreaker had been the Healy, a vessel intended as a platform for scientific research and having only medium ice breaking capability. The 399-foot, 75,000-horsepower Polar Star is a heavy-duty icebreaker.

There has long been concern about the lack of U.S. icebreaking capacity, especially as Arctic offshore activity grows in response to the shrinking sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean. And that concern has led to a continuing debate about the relative merits of refurbishing old icebreakers versus building new ones — the construction of heavy duty icebreakers is extremely expensive.

Polar Sea on hold

In June 2012, following a meeting between Coast Guard Commandant Robert Papp and Sens. Lisa Murkowski, Begich and Cantwell, the Coast Guard decided to put on hold the planned scrapping of the heavy icebreaker Polar Sea, the sister ship to the Polar Star, pending an evaluation by Congress and the administration on how best to meet the nation’s icebreaking needs. The Polar Sea has been laid up in Seattle following engine problems with the vessel in 2010.

The Coast Guard’s current five-year plan includes $860 million for a new icebreaker, with $8 million of that sum being in President Obama’s 2013 budget for planning and design work.

“As chairman of the Senate Oceans Subcommittee, I have made this issue a top priority,” Begich said in the April 8 press release. “After relying on just one operational icebreaker for years, having the Polar Star back up and running is great news. But with the increased marine traffic through the Arctic and energy exploration underway in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas, there is no question we need more icebreakers to protect our nation’s economic and national security interests. I look forward to continuing to work with Sen. Cantwell so we can get the commitment to build a new class of heavy icebreakers to meet our nation’s needs while keeping options open for our two remaining Polar-class icebreakers.”

Sequestration

Asked whether federal budget cuts, commonly referred to as “sequestration,” would impact the U.S. icebreaker program, Begich told Petroleum News March 27 that although sequestration may impact plans to upgrade U.S. icebreaker capabilities for the Arctic, he sensed that plans to renovate two existing icebreakers and to develop a new icebreaker are still moving forward.

“The planning money is still there and there seems to be a much more significant commitment from the White House, recognizing that Coast Guard capacity, including icebreakers in the Arctic, is crucial for long-term development,” Begich said.

—Alan Bailey


Petroleum News - Phone: 1-907 522-9469 - Fax: 1-907 522-9583
[email protected] --- http://www.petroleumnews.com ---
S U B S C R I B E

Copyright Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA)©2013 All rights reserved. The content of this article and web site may not be copied, replaced, distributed, published, displayed or transferred in any form or by any means except with the prior written permission of Petroleum Newspapers of Alaska, LLC (Petroleum News)(PNA). Copyright infringement is a violation of federal law subject to criminal and civil penalties.